- Volume 9 Number 6 (Dec. 2023)
- Volume 9 Number 5 (Oct. 2023)
- Volume 9 Number 4 (Aug. 2023)
- Volume 9 Number 3 (Jun. 2023)
- Volume 9 Number 2 (Apr. 2023)
- Volume 9 Number 1 (Feb. 2023)
- Volume 8 Number 4 (Dec. 2022)
- Volume 8 Number 3 (Sep. 2022)
- Volume 8 Number 2 (Jun. 2022)
- Volume 8 Number 1 (Mar. 2022)
- Volume 7 Number 4 (Dec. 2021)
- Volume 7 Number 3 (Sep. 2021)
- Volume 7 Number 2 (Jun. 2021)
- Volume 7 Number 1 (Mar. 2021)
- Volume 6 Number 4 (Dec. 2020)
- Volume 6 Number 3 (Sep. 2020)
- Volume 6 Number 2 (Jun. 2020)
- Volume 6 Number 1 (Mar. 2020)
- Volume 5 Number 4 (Dec. 2019)
- Volume 5 Number 3 (Sep. 2019)
- Volume 5 Number 2 (Jun. 2019)
- Volume 5 Number 1 (Mar. 2019)
- Volume 4 Number 4 (Dec. 2018)
- Volume 4 Number 3 (Sep. 2018)
- Volume 4 Number 2 (Jun. 2018)
- Volume 4 Number 1 (Mar. 2018)
- Volume 3 Number 4 (Dec. 2017)
- Volume 3 Number 3 (Sep. 2017)
- Volume 3 Number 2 (Jun. 2017)
- Volume 3 Number 1 (Mar. 2017)
- Volume 2 Number 4 (Dec. 2016)
- Volume 2 Number 3 (Sep. 2016)
- Volume 2 Number 2 (Jun. 2016)
- Volume 2 Number 1 (Mar. 2016)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
- ISSN: 2382-6282 (Print); 2972-3108 (Online)
- Abbreviated Title: Int. J. Lang. Lit. Linguist.
- Frequency: Bimonthly
- DOI: 10.18178/IJLLL
- Editor-in-Chief: Dr. Jason Miin-Hwa Lim
- Managing Editor: Jennifer X. Zeng
- Indexed by: CNKI, Google Scholar, Crossref,
- E-mail: ijlll_Editor@126.com
IJLLL 2015 Vol.1(2): 80-86 ISSN: 2382-6282
DOI: 10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.17
DOI: 10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.17
Comparison of e-Learning, Blended and Traditional English Teaching Methods: A Case Study of Ban Hong Community Education College
Sayoomporn Promsurin and Jirapa Vitayapirak
Abstract—With the global interest in computers, innovative teaching methods have been oriented to English language learning environments. The objectives of this research were to compare the effectiveness of the three English teaching methods, i.e. e-learning, blended learning, and traditional instruction and assess students’ satisfaction. The samples were 90 first year vocational certificate students who enrolled on an English course in the academic year 2013 at Ban Hong Community Education College, Thailand. Those students were divided into three groups of 30, i.e. two experimental groups and one control group by using simple random sampling. The first experimental group was taught through e-learning instruction, the second experimental group was taught through blended learning instruction, whereas the control group was taught through traditional instruction. The study was conducted two hours a week for eight weeks period. The main findings indicated that blended learning instruction can significantly increase the students’ achievement scores and the students show highly positive satisfaction towards learning language English.
Index Terms—E-Learning, blended learning, traditional instruction, English teaching method, students’ satisfaction, Thai.
Sayoomporn Promsurin is with the Dept. of Applied Linguistics (English for Science and Technology), King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand (e-mail: ym_yoom@hotmail.com).
Jirapa Vitayapirak is with the Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand (e-mail: kvjirapa@kmitl.ac.th).
Index Terms—E-Learning, blended learning, traditional instruction, English teaching method, students’ satisfaction, Thai.
Sayoomporn Promsurin is with the Dept. of Applied Linguistics (English for Science and Technology), King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand (e-mail: ym_yoom@hotmail.com).
Jirapa Vitayapirak is with the Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Thailand (e-mail: kvjirapa@kmitl.ac.th).
Cite:Sayoomporn Promsurin and Jirapa Vitayapirak, "Comparison of e-Learning, Blended and Traditional English Teaching Methods: A Case Study of Ban Hong Community Education College," International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 80-86, 2015.